It alleges that on information and belief, this scheme continues "to this date." Id., ¶ 17. The Amended Complaint alleges Paine Webber Group and its operating subsidiaries, including PaineWebber Inc., formed and implemented an unlawful scheme "eginning not later than" 30 September 1986 "with respect to employee compensation" (the "Overriding Scheme"). notified Casper she was being terminated from administrative leave and would be paid only through 31 December 1989. in September 1989 and retained that position until 22 December 1989 when Casper was placed on administrative leave. It alleges she was promoted to Corporate Vice President of PaineWebber Inc. as Compensation Director from approximately June 1987 to September 1989. The Amended Complaint alleges Casper was employed by PaineWebber Inc. The Amended Complaint alleges, on information and belief, Schwartz is a resident of New York and has transacted and does transact business in New Jersey. It is the wholly owned subsidiary of Paine Webber Group. is a non-New Jersey corporation maintaining its principal place of business in New York, New York and has done and is doing business in New Jersey. The Amended Complaint alleges Paine Webber Group has done and is doing business in New Jersey. Paine Webber Group is a securities firm which is incorporated in Delaware and which has its principal administrative and business offices in New York, New York. The motion to dismiss is denied with respect to Count Six and Counts Eight through Fourteen.Ĭasper is a resident of Milltown, New Jersey. Counts One through Five and Count Seven of the Amended Complaint are dismissed. For the reasons set forth below, *1484 the motion is granted in part and denied in part. The Defendants move to dismiss the Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint").
Diversity and federal question jurisdiction are alleged pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 206, and New Jersey common and statutory law. § 1961 et seq., the Equal Pay Act (the "EPA"), 29 U.S.C. Schwartz ("Schwartz"), Casper's former supervisor (collectively, the "Defendants"), for alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. Casper ("Casper") against her former employer PaineWebber Incorporated ("PaineWebber Inc."), its parent company Paine Webber Group, Inc. This is an action brought by plaintiff Jeanne C. Finkelstein, Hannoch Weisman, Roseland, N.J., for defendants. Ellenport, P.A., Clark, N.J., for plaintiff. PAINE WEBBER GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Painewebber Incorporated, a corporation and Ronald M.
0 kommentar(er)
